ABSTRACT
Background: Coronavirus infection (COVID-19) is the cause of the current world-wide pandemic. Cardiovascular complications occur in 20-30% of patients with COVID-19 infection including myocardial injury and arrhythmias. Current understanding of specific arrhythmia type and frequency is limited. In response to COVID-19 pandemic and overwhelmed hospital critical care and telemetry recourses, patch-based cardiac monitoring system received emergency Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval for inpatient monitoring. A patch-based cardiac telemetry system has been shown to be useful for patient management during the COVID-19 pandemic and provides detailed analysis of cardiac rhythms. Purpose: To analyze arrhythmia type and frequency in patients with COVID-19 infection, identifying arrhythmia patterns over time during hospitalization and after discharge. Methods: A prospective cohort study during the COVID-19 pandemic was performed. We included patients hospitalized with COVID-19 infection who had a patch-based mobile telemetry device placed for cardiac monitoring. A quantitative analysis including type, frequency and duration of detected arrhythmias was performed at the end of the monitoring period. Results: A total of 103 patients hospitalized with COVID-19 diagnosis underwent monitoring. Quantitative reports for 59 patients were available for analysis, among those 59% were males, median age 65 (IQR 56-76) yrs. Mean wear time was 6.8±5.0 days. Arrhythmias were detected in 72.9% of patients. Majority of arrhythmias were SVT (59.3% of patients) and AF (22.0%). Episodes of AF duration >30 min were detected in 12 patients. New onset AF was noted in 15.0% of patients and was significantly associated with age (OR 1.4 for 5 yrs difference;95% CI 1.01-2.05). Brady arrhythmias (2nd degree, 3rd degree AV bock, pause≥3 seconds) were seen in 18.7% of patients. Arrhythmias were consistently detected throughout the monitoring period in 52.9%-89.5% of patients daily (Figure 1). In 9 patients who were discharged with continued patch monitoring, 3 patients (33.3%) had arrhythmic events during their outpatient monitoring period. Conclusion: A majority of patients hospitalized with COVID-19 infection had arrhythmias detected by patch cardiac monitor. Arrhythmias were observed throughout hospitalization with a consistent daily frequency. Patients continued to exhibit cardiac arrhythmias after hospital discharge of a type similar to that seen during hospitalization. New onset AF often occurred and was associated with older age. Inpatient application of a patch cardiac telemetry with continued monitoring as outpatient is feasible and effective in detecting occult arrhythmias in patients with COVID-19 infection. (Figure Presented).
ABSTRACT
Background: Prone position is a valuable treatment strategy in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and is frequently used in surgical scenarios. Nonetheless, prone position may hinder proper acquisition and interpretation of the 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) as there is a sparsity of data regarding standardization of lead position and interpretation. Objective: We aimed to analyze and compare ECGs in the supine and prone positions to provide guidance for adequate interpretation and clinical utility of the ECG in prone position. Methods: This was a multicenter prospective cohort study in which ECGs in the prone and supine position were compared, including patients with COVID-19 infection and healthy controls. The precordial leads for the prone ECGs were placed in the following fashion: V1 in the right paraspinal region at the level of the T7 vertebra, V2 in the left paraspinal region at the level of the T7 vertebra, V4 in the mid-scapular region at the level of the T8 vertebra (approximately bellow the tip of the scapula), V3 halfway between V3 and V4, V5 at the posterior axillary line at the level of the T8 vertebra, and V6 at the mid-axillary line at the level of T8 vertebra - same position as the V6 in the supine position. Results: A total of 45 patients with COVID-19 infection were compared with 40 healthy volunteers (48% of the patients were female, the mean age in the entire cohort was 48.8 years, and the mean BMI was 27.9). The mean heart rate, PR interval, QRS duration, QT and QTc interval, and QRS axis in the frontal plane were found to positively correlate in supine and prone ECGs. The main difference found was no correlation of the QRS amplitude between supine and prone ECGs in leads V1, V2, V3, and V4;but there was positive correlation in leads V5 and V6. Prominent Q waves were present in the anteroseptal leads (V1-V3) in the prone posterior position. In addition, T-wave inversions or flattening were observed in leads V1 and V2 were present in a majority of patients in the prone posterior position. Conclusion: ECGs performed in the prone position are an acceptable alternative to supine ECGs. Special attention and review of prior supine ECGs may be necessary for precise interpretation of the anteroseptal precordial leads which may be misleading (i.e, septal infarct).